|
|
| Position Statement |
| MAI Statement - December, 1998 |
The Coordinating Committee of the ASGP has signed on to the following statement on the Multilateral Agreement on Investment. Dean Myerson, ASGP Secretary 12-1-98 This sign-on letter from Third World Network from Malaysia, was presented at the OECD Meeting in Paris, October 20 1998. More than 60 groups have already signed it. We are gathering sign-ons from organizations world wide to this letter, and encourage you to sign it and also circulate it to other organizations. The WTO working group on the Relationship between Trade and Investment is meeting in Geneva, November 23-24, and here it will be decided whether it should be upgraded to a formal negotiating group or continue to be a working group. It is important for NGOs to stress the fact that it is the substance of the MAI we oppose, not the venue, and that we will oppose MAI-like rules wherever they appear. However, this letter also describes why the WTO is not a suitable arena for MAI from developing countries perspective. Please send your sign-ons to mstrand@citizen.org or to Third World Network at twn@igc.apc.org by November 20st. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CALL TO REJECT ANY PROPOSAL FOR MOVING THE MAI OR AN INVESTMENT AGREEMENT TO THE WTO. 1. The Multilateral Agreement on Investment in the OECD has run into problems because of strong public protests in many OECD countries as well as objections from developing-country groups and governments. Objections from the public include that the MAI would grant new unprecedented rights for corporations (whilst removing the authority of states to place obligations or regulations on them), threaten national sovereignty and the viability of domestic firms and farms, remove conditions for development in the South and magnify environmental and social problems. Since there is no sign that the OECD governments are willing to consider a basic change in the premises and framework of the MAI, we call for the termination of the negotiations and the treaty in the OECD. 2. We are very concerned by the moves of some OECD governments, includingthe European Union, to move the MAI process to the World Trade Organisation (WTO). The North countries have recently been pushing very hard in the WTO (including its Working Group on Trade and Investment) to get developing countries to agree to upgrade the present "discussions" into negotiations for an MAI-type agreement. They hope to get the Working Group to decide on this perhaps as early as at its next meeting in November 1998. 3. Some of the North countries claim this will make it fairer for developing countries and, moreover, environmental and labour concerns will be taken care of in the WTO. We reject these claims. Instead, shifting the investment issue to the WTO will place great pressure on developing countries to negotiate and eventually join an agreement that would have disastrous effects on their development prospects. Moreover, promises to include environmental and social concerns are likely to be only an eyewash to co-opt the public to accept the basic tenets of the MAI. The strong enforcement capability of the WTO through its dispute settlement system will also mean that all countries, especially developing countries, will be forced to comply. Domestic laws and policies in a wide range of issues will have to be changed, even if these were to cause job losses, closure of local enterprises and farms, financial instability, balance of payments deficits and environmental deterioration. 4. We therefore call on all governments, OECD and non-OECD alike, toreject any proposal to negotiate an investment agreement in the WTO. The trade and investment working group in the WTO should be confined to ONLY STUDY the trade and investment relation and should not be "upgraded" into a NEGOTIATING forum for an investment AGREEMENT. The proposals by the EU and other major countries to start a "Millennium Round" or a "comprehensive future agenda" for the WTO should not be used as a devise to sneak in an investment negotiation process in the WTO. 5. On principle, we are against the kind of assumptions and frameworkthat the MAI represents. As public knowledge on the MAI increases, many more people are rejecting this approach. We call on governments, international agencies and NGOs not to accept the MAI or a similar investment approach as inevitable or a "given" but instead to choose a basically different approach in dealing with the investment issue. 6. Towards this alternative approach, we call for global and national guidelines, rules and regulations to place obligations on investors and corporations so that their activities and products serve the needs of people within a framework of internationally fair, socially just and environmentally sound development. Third World Network ECOROPA Observatoire de la Mondialisation Coordination Centre L'AMI (French Coordination Centre against the MAI) Council of Canadians Health Action International National Campaign against the MAI in Canada Global Trade Watch, Public Citizen (USA) Friends of the Earth (USA) International Coalition of Development Action People's Decade of Human Rights Education Habitat International Coalition Citizens for a Democratic Renaissance (Ireland) Women's Environment and Development Organisation Red Thread (Guyana) Friends of the Earth International National Wildlife Federation (USA) Eco News Africa (Kenya) Alternative Information and Development Centre (South Africa) Global Publications Foundation (Sweden) Peoples' Forum 2001 (Japan) Focus on Global South (Thailand) WEED-World Economy, Ecology and Development Association (Germany) Germanwatch, North-South Initiative (Germany) Polaris Institute (Canada) Consumers Association of Penang (Malaysia) UBINIG (Bangladesh) Council for Responsible Genetics (USA) Washington Biotechnology Action Council (USA) GATT WTO Campaign (Norway) Network Women in Development Europe (WIDE) Oscar Zamora, University of the Philippines Los Banos (the Philippines) All India Association of Industries A-SEED Europe Biowatch South Africa Genetic Resources Action International (GRAIN) Institute for Sustainable Development (Ethiopia) Women's International League for Peace and Freedom Southern African Traditional Leaders' Council for the Management of Natural Resources C.I.I.R. (UK) Gaia Foundation (UK) Forum of Parliamentarians on Intellectual Property and WTO Issues (India) National Working Group on Patent Laws (India) Centre for Study of Global Patent System and Development (India) Amazon Watch (USA) Towards a Different Europe Corporate Europe Observatory Friends of the Earth (Netherlands) The Corner House (UK) Asia-Japan Women's Resource Center Instituto Brasileiro de Analises Sociais E Economicas (IBASE - The Brazilian Institute for Social and Economic Analysis) Indigenous Peoples' International Center for Policy Research and Education (TEBTEBBA, Philippines) Asian Indigenous Women's Network Lithuanian Green Movement/Friends of the Earth (Lithuania) The Edmonds Institute (USA) Friends of the Earth (Sweden) Center for Environmental Public Advocacy (Slovak Republic) Campaign Against Foreign Control of Aotearoa (CAFCA) Pacific Asia Resource Center (Japan) Central and Eastern European Bankwatch Network National Society of Conservationists/Friends of the Earth (Hungary) Alternative Information & Development Centre (South Africa) A SEED Japan Center for International Environmental Law (USA) ALTERNATIVREFERAT (Austrian Students Union, University for Agricultural Science) Yayori Matsui (Japan) CUSO Asia/Pacific JAPEC Monitor NGO Network (Japan) Canadian Environmental Law Association Institute of Alternative Policies for the Southern Cone of Latin America (PACS) Sarawak Campaign Committee (Japan) Alliance for Justice, Medical Mission Sisters (USA) Ruth Caplan, Alliance for Democracy (USA) Josh Karliner, Transnational Resource and Action Center (USA) Nancy Allen (Co-Chair), Maine Green Party (USA) Indonesian Bioforum Foundation for Public Interest People-Centered Development Forum (USA) The Ecologist (UK) World YWCA Urgewald (Germany) Rainforest Information Center (USA) ISMUN International Society for Ghandian Studies Religious of the Sacred Heart International Commission for Justice and Peace Both Ends World Development Movement (UK) Accao Ambiental para O Barlavento (Portugal) AMIGRANSA (Sociedad de Amigos en Defensa de la Gran Sabana, Venezuela) Oil Alert Network (Orinoco Oilwatch, Venezuela) Public Information Network (USA) SOL Communications (USA) World Information Transfer Action Resource Center (USA) Global Resource Action Center for the Environment (USA) Proutist Universal, Inc, (North America) KONPHALINDO (Indonesia) Environmental Monitoring Group (South Africa) Watch Indonesia Saskia Ozinga, FERN (UK) Maurizio Farhan Ferrari, World Rainforest Movement (UK) Marcus Colchester, Forest Peoples Programme Association of Organizations for Social and Educational Assistance (FASE, Brazil) Play Fair Europe (Germany) Third World Forum (international, Senegal) Rainforest Action Network (USA) Center for Encounter and Active Nonviolence (Austria) Platform Vorarlberg for an MAI-free Austria Afro-Asiatisches Institut Salzburg (Austria) Sipho Moyo, African Development Bank Enda Maghreb (Morocco) ARGE Schopfungsverantwortung (Austria) Diverse Women for Diversity (India) BIOTHAI (The Thai Network on Community Rights and Biodiversity) German Forum for Environment and Development, WG Biodiversity Neckargemund Talks of Women And Environment United Metal Workers Union (Turkey) Margrete Strand Rangnes MAI Project Coordinator Public Citizen Global Trade Watch 215 Pennsylvania Ave, SE Washington DC, 20003 mstrand@citizen.org 202-546 4996, ext. 306 202-547 7392 (fax)
|
